특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentence of the lower court (one year of suspended execution and ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for four months) is too unreasonable as the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.
2. That the defendant would not once again drive drinking or drive without a license;
It is recognized that there are many other things.
However, the defendant again committed each of the crimes in this case, even though he had been sentenced to two years of suspended execution for 6 months due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act in 2013, a fine of 4 million won, a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in around 2014, a crime of violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, a crime of violating the Act on Traffic Accidents, a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in around 2015, and a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in this case, a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in 2015, and a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in this case. In particular, the defendant committed the second crime in the judgment of the court below during the period of suspended execution after the judgment became final and conclusive as well as the second crime in this case during the period of suspended execution after the judgment became final and conclusive, and there is considerable social risk that traffic related crimes such as drinking are considerably harmful to an unspecified person, and there is no reason to believe that the defendant's punishment is unfair.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.