However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-Wood vehicle.

On September 1, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car at a speed of about 40 km depending on the 2-lane from the 4-lane surface of the Suwon-dong, Busan, Daegu, the west-gu. The Defendant driven the above car at a speed of about 0 km along the 2-lane surface.

At the same time, the victim C (the age of 29) is running a d bargaining passenger car operated by the victim C (the age of 29). In this case, when a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle changes the vehicle, he/she has a duty of care to operate the direction, etc. to give an advance notice of change of course and to change the vehicle line by taking into account the traffic situation of the front and rear

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to change the vehicle line into one lane as it is, and received the top top top top of the passenger vehicle operated by the victim with the front top of the driver's seat of the motor vehicle operated by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained a sleep for two weeks in need of treatment, and at the same time, the repair cost of 818,500 won, such as the exchange of front slickers, was destroyed to the extent that the above 818,50 won was damaged, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as making a stop immediately and providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of escape after occupational injury), Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant committed the instant crime, even though he/she had the same criminal record, for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act.