However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant was aware that he had no authority in connection with the interior removal work of medical welfare facilities for the aged in Busan Dongdong-gu C, and there was no authority granted by B to conclude a subcontract contract related to the above building removal work.

Nevertheless, on May 2, 2014, the Defendant entered “F nearby life and welfare facility removal works for the aged” in the construction order column of the standard subcontract site at the office E office operated by the Defendant, which is located in the window 301 of Changwon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (209,000,000), “B” in the contract amount column (209,000,000), “B” in the upper column of the main section, “H (214), “H” in the main section, and “H” in the representative director column, and “H” and “A 301,01,00,000,000 in the representative column of Changwon-si Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City).

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant drafted a copy of the subcontracting contract in the name of B, a private document on rights and obligations, which is a private document, using qualification as agent of B.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as described in paragraph 1, issued a subcontract agreement prepared as above to I who is aware of the fact that the contract was duly formed.

3. The defrauded presented that the above subcontracting contract in the same date, time, and place as described in paragraph 1 was genuine, and the victim I would be awarded a subcontract to the victim I for the removal work of the neighborhood life and the interior removal work of the medical welfare facilities for the aged in Busan Metropolitan City, Dong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City.

The phrase “the phrase was false.”

However, the defendant was awarded a contract for the removal of the above building from the corporation B.