Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 2,559,553 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from September 4, 2010 to December 20, 2013, and the following.

Reasons

(3) The Plaintiff alleged that the noise between floors was damaged by the noise between floors of the instant apartment complex. However, it is not sufficient to acknowledge the entries and images of evidence Nos. 10 and 11, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Rather, according to the appraiser I’s appraisal, it is difficult to find that the inter-story noise, which is the upper floor of the instant apartment complex, falls under the upper floor Nos. 110 and 2204, and the upper floor noise which is measured by sounding the number in the instant apartment complex, falls under the upper class of light shock level and heavy shock level, it cannot be recognized that the occurrence of damages caused by the noise between floors is not recognized. (4) The Plaintiff’s aforementioned assertion is without merit. (a) The Plaintiff asserted that the installation of air-conditioning and heating equipment Nos. 20 with respect to the quality and performance of apartment complex No. 10 and the installation of air-conditioning and heating equipment No. 20 with respect to the construction of apartment complex No. 3, the Defendant changed the installation of air-conditioning and heating System No. 20 to the above “No No. 29”).