However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CK5 vehicles.

On January 25, 2015, the Defendant driving the above vehicle at around 21:20, and driving the vehicle in the direction of the upstream distance from the direction of the two streets along the five lanes in front of the E households located in Daegu Suwon-gu D.

At the same time, it is difficult to secure the vision in the state of leaving, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the motor vehicle name by thoroughly taking the front door.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the front-time of the front-time and neglected to follow the signal, and instead neglected to follow the direction of the victim F (V, 56 years old) who was standing on the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals, was in front of the above vehicle.

As a result, the defendant suffered from the victim's negligence in the course of such occupational negligence for about 8 weeks of medical treatment, such as the cutting of the upper part of the body of relatives.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a traffic accident report, and a standing investigation report;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Selection of Imprisonment without prison labor for a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (including efforts to recover damage) of the first type of ordinary traffic accident (Article 4-10 months) (Article 3(2) (Article 3(1)) (Article 3(1)) (Article 3(1)) (Article 3(2)) of the Special School Education Act / In a case where illegality is serious (Article 3(2) (Article 3(1) (Article 3(1)) (Article 3(1) of the Special School Education Act) (Article 62-2(1)) (Article 62(1)) of the Act

However, the defendant has been dissatising and dissatising the defendant's missatis.