손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant) against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) A and B, respectively, KRW 12,00,000, and Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) C Co., Ltd.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. From 1991 to 191, Plaintiff A is a person who runs a balming business with the trade name of “F” on several lots of land outside Gyeonggi-gun E, and Plaintiff B is a partner of Plaintiff A, who is a partner of Plaintiff A, and is engaged in a balming business with “H” on several lots of land outside Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-gun, 1996.
On April 29, 2013, the aforementioned Plaintiffs established Plaintiff C Co., Ltd. by adding up both the aforementioned F and H’s various accounts.
B. Meanwhile, on September 30, 1998, Nonparty I, the Defendant’s denial, filed a lawsuit against Plaintiff A and Nonparty L, the Plaintiff’s partner of the Seoul District Court, as the Government-funded 99Da40166, after completing the registration of ownership transfer on the Gyeonggi-do J and K land (hereinafter “Defendant’s land”).
C. As to this, Plaintiff A and Nonparty L, who is the father of the above I in the above litigation, was a public official belonging to the Sicheon-gun Forest and its affiliated public official. After ascertaining the situation that the land on the part of the Defendant was the owner or the unclaimed owner, it was judged in favor of the Defendant. ② Since most of the land on the part of the Defendant was used for military operations, it was difficult for the Defendant to use the land for other purposes, the Defendant purchased the land on the part of the Defendant on the ground that he was the wife, and ③ thereafter, requested the Plaintiff and Nonparty L, who is its affiliated public official, to purchase the land on the part of the Defendant at KRW 10,000 per ordinary day, and then requested the purchase of the land on the part of the Defendant at KRW 30,000 per square day on the part of the Plaintiff and its affiliated public official, the Defendant raised a lawsuit demanding the removal of the subdivision at KRW 30,000,000 or more.
However, on June 20, 200, the above court rejected the above assertion made by the Plaintiff A and Nonparty L, who is its her her her her her her her her her her her her 1,500 square meters and 63 square meters, and 5 square meters and 222 square meters, among 1,072 square meters and 1,072 square meters per other her her her her her her her her