beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.05.12 2015가합206670

학칙무효확인 등

Text

1. The defendant's KRW 17,384,250 among the plaintiff's KRW 17,384,250 and the attached sheet "the details of benefits before re-election and the difference" shall be stated.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. (1) The Defendant is a school juristic person operating C University (hereinafter “Defendant juristic person”) or the Plaintiff is appointed as a full-time lecturer at the Defendant University on March 1, 1997, and on September 1, 2013, the Plaintiff is reappointed (period: from September 1, 2013 to August 31, 2018) pursuant to the Rules on Appointment of Faculty Members at the Defendant University (hereinafter “Rules on Appointment”) and is employed as teaching staff until then.

Teachers whose term of appointment expires pursuant to Article 22 (Re-Appointment of Teachers) of the Regulations on Appointment of Teachers of C University shall be reappointed by the president on the recommendation of the president after deliberation by the teachers' personnel committee.

Article 22-2 (Examination and Evaluation of Teaching Staff for Re-Appointment) (1) Teachers subject to re-election shall have teaching experience in accordance with the standards for recognition of the regulations on evaluation of teaching staff.

Article 22-3 (Notification of Re-Appointment) (1) An appointment authority shall notify the relevant teacher of the fact that the term of appointment expires 4 months prior to the expiration of the term of appointment when the term of appointment expires, and that he/she may apply for deliberation on re-election.

(2) Where a teacher notified pursuant to paragraph (1) intends to be reappointed, he/she shall apply for deliberation on reappointment to the appointing authority within 15 days from the date of notification.

(3) The appointing authority upon receipt of an application for deliberation on reappointment shall determine whether to re-appoint the relevant teacher after deliberation by the teachers' personnel committee, and notify such fact to the relevant teacher not later than two months before the expiration of the appointment contract period.

In such cases, when the relevant teacher decides not to be reappointed, he/she shall clearly state his/her intention not to be reappointed and grounds for rejection of reappointment.

(2) The principal contents of the appointment regulations are as follows.

B. Article 10 of the Guidelines for Waste Major of the Defendant University (hereinafter “instant Guidelines”) amended as of June 7, 201, including the process of amendment to the school regulations of the instant case.