If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Although the Defendant had no intent or ability to repay money from the victim B even if he/she borrowed money from the victim B, on July 3, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the D hotel located in the Gumi-si, the Defendant: (b) on July 3, 2012, he/she was deprived of his/her vehicle to the victim B; and (c) he/she went to the effect that it is known to the company because he/she was in the state of drinking and non-licenseing; (d) on August 9, 2012, if he/she loaned the agreed amount of KRW 9 million, he/she would pay the agreed amount of KRW 40 million; and (b) on July 20, 2012, he/she received 6 million in the name of the loan; and (b) on July 20, 2012, he/she acquired 8 million won in total, such as receiving the victim’s money to replace the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to loan certificates, copies of passbooks, text messages printed out, and investigation report (suspects’ words and actions against suspect statements);

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;