폭행
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) around 05:15 on December 1, 2013, the Defendant: (b) around 2013, while getting on and off a taxi for driving Victim C (the age of 47) before Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, etc. 2, 365-94, and the Defendant did not have the way to the road, and (c) the Defendant was getting off to the said taxi
Accordingly, the Defendant dump dump dumped the victim's bump and dumped the victim's face from the driver's seat, and assaulted the victim's face.
2. The statements made at the police station of the victim that correspond to the facts charged in the instant case are difficult to believe in light of the following legal statements made by the victim and witness D:
The victim stated in this court about the background of this case, while making a statement about the head of the balth, he did not have drawn up in the driver's seat by cutting balth, while he did not have drawn up the balth in the driver's seat. After confirming the contents of the statement in the investigative agency, the victim stated that he dalthdddddddddddd and dumd as in the charge.
Although the victim stated that he was assaulted after getting off the taxi as stated in the facts charged by the police, this court confirmed that he was taken a drinking face from the defendant in the taxi being driven, and that the police did so in the manner that the defense counsel asked the reasons why he did not make a statement about the assault in the taxi.
However, it does not seem that the victim himself/herself knows about the assault of the driver subject to aggravated punishment and made the above statement in the same sense.
더욱이 운전 중의 폭행에 관한 피해자의 법정진술은 주먹으로 가격하였다고 하였다가 그냥 툭 쳤다고 하는 등 일관되지도 않는다.
The victim was at the right side of the police, but in this court, the defendant franchising.