beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.05.17 2016고정841

명예훼손

Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million and by a fine of KRW 2 million.

The Defendants did not pay a fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A from January 26, 2013, from around the Cheongju-si, a petition E is in charge of an objection, and Defendant B is in charge of an audit of the above village from January 26, 2013.

From around 200 to January 15, 2013, the Defendants are suspected to have deducted KRW 11.5 million from the victim F, who was a former head of the above village. On June 2015, the Defendants confirmed that Defendant B’s office located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, submitted a statement of accounts from the damaged party and the statement of accounts from the balance of the village deposit account and confirmed that the village fund was properly managed by reducing the settled amount from the balance of the village deposit account, and instead, even though the community fund was confirmed to remain in KRW 11.5 million on the account book around 201, the Defendants prepared a false statement of “annual statement of accounts” stating that the balance of the second head of the Tong -1508,800,000,000 won of the village fund in around 201.

A. After that, on June 9, 2015, the Defendants informed K, L, and M of the fact that the general N’s executive officer K, L, and M demanded to hold an extraordinary general meeting at the “J restaurant” located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheong-si, Cheong-si, the Defendants distributed the “E-Annual Statement” falsely prepared and confirmed that the amount of KRW 1,50,000 in the village was rained when considering the F objection.

B. On July 5, 2015, at around 11:00, the Defendants distributed the “annual statement” that was falsely prepared to approximately 25 residents of the above community, including K, in an extraordinary general meeting held in the above community center located in the Dong-gu, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and that “The amount of KRW 11:5 million in the village money was confirmed when considering the F objection.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired with village executives and village residents, thereby impairing the honor of the victims by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

The Defendants’ partial testimony witness F and N’s legal statement are examined.