특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
(e).
Punishment of the crime
On November 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Labor Standards Act in Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong Housing Site District Court’s violation of the Labor Standards Act, etc. on October 5, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 5, 2015.
[2] The Defendant, on December 7, 2014, appears to be the victim’s bill of indictment (state) for the F operation in the Guri-si E on December 7, 2014, but the victim who supplied steel to the Defendant and was not paid the price. Thus, the Defendant revised the facts charged ex officio to the extent that it does not interfere with the Defendant’s exercise of the right to defense.
The same shall also apply to the victim (State) ethyl, (State) ethyl ethyl ethyls.
In the office, the victim made a false statement to the effect that “to pay steel prices to the victim by December 31, 2014 on the main page of supplying steel.”
However, in fact, the Defendant had been in arrears with the employees of H(State) and (State) I of the Defendant’s operation; (i) had been in arrears with the payment of wages; (ii) had been ordered to pay the rent for JW car, which is the leased vehicle of JW car of the I (State); and (iii) had to pay the installments for the Kamen car, which is the purchasing vehicle of the I (State), to the extent that the Defendant and the Defendant’s wife were unable to pay the installments; (iv) had been sold during December 2014, and was planned to use the Defendant’s real estate to pay the unpaid taxes and overdue wages not for the victim’s steel payment; (iv) had already been sold during the real estate market price, but there had not been no collateral or sales value since the establishment of the right to collateral security and provisional seizure in which H’s real estate market price was set; and (v) had no other property or revenue source; and (v) had no intent or ability to pay the funds to H (State) to the Defendant.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby deceivings the victim, the defendant 51,796,80 won at the market price on December 8, 2014 and H-h-h-h8.