대부업등의등록및금융이용자보호에관한법률위반등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and one hundred and twenty hours of social service) is too unreasonable.
2. In light of the fact that the defendant is led to the confession of the defendant, that there is no previous fault, or that there is no previous fault, or that the case is not light in light of the amount loaned by the defendant, the size of the amount loaned by the defendant, the period during which the defendant engages in credit business, etc., the fact that the defendant exceeded the limited interest rate, the circumstances related to the methods of debt collection are not good, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, occupation, family relationship, etc., it cannot be
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is groundless.
(However, Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure provides that "a debt collector shall not threaten a debtor in connection with debt collection" under Section 2 of the judgment below, the fourth and second of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected ex officio and deleted.