However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 8, 2014, at around 21:57, the Defendant: (a) expressed a desire to “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am in the middle-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Jung-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and 35 South am sambling the Defendant in front of the engine

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of fire officers concerning rescue and relief operations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to C, D, and E

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

3. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment] from January to February 20 (the result of the multiple guidelines for handling a crime) of the Criminal Act [the decision of sentencing] The defendant led to confession of a crime and received psychological counseling and treatment on his/her own, and there is no record of crime, and the defendant's age, environment, circumstances of the crime in this case, details, and circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered as the order of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act.