A shall be punished by a fine of 50,000 won, and a fine of 300,000 won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

1. Defendant A, at around 02:10 on March 10, 2016, at the direction of E convenience stores located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, the victim G ( South, 29 years old), H ( South, and 29 years old) complained against the Defendants, the police officer, and the police officer, and the police officer, and the police officer, and police officer, and police officer, and police officer, and police officer, and police officer, and police officer, and police officer, and police officer, and police officer, and police officer, and police officer, police officer, police officer, etc

2. At the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, Defendant B, Defendant B, who was the first executive of Defendant B, was dissatisfied with the victim H and his conduct as above, and Defendant B, committed assault against the victim, jointly with J and J, by keeping the victim closely and jointly with the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each protocol of examination of suspect (I, J, B, or F);

1. Statement protocol (H);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (CCTV verification report);

1. Relevant legal provisions and choice of punishment on the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Article 260(1) of each Criminal Act (Selection of a penalty)

B. Defendant B: Article 2(2)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (elective selection)

1. A aggravated defendant for concurrent crimes: The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Taking account of the following: (a) the Defendants’ reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act committed assault against each victim; (b) the extent and method of assault; (c) Defendant B agreed with G; and (d) G did not constitute Defendant B’s punishment; and (c) the Defendants did not have any criminal punishment.