When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Although the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay money even if he borrowed money, the Defendant borrowed money from the Victim C (Y, 67 years of age) to the Defendant on April 2012, 201, stating that “The Defendant borrowed money from the Defendant to lend KRW 2,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, and did not pay the money from the Defendant.”

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, thereby causing the victim to KRW 2.5 million from the victim around April 9, 2012, and the same year.

5. Around 17.17. Around 2.5 million won, a total of five million won was remitted to a corporate bank account in the name of D and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a loan certificate and a statement of transactions [the fact of deception is recognized in light of the following circumstances recognized by each evidence in the market, namely, that the defendant was in a bad credit standing at the time of lending the money held by him/her, and that he/she could have been unable to pay his/her wages and monthly rent to him/her at the time when he/she was operated, and that he/she could not submit any particular material about his/her ability at the time

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;