Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The Defendant owned 5,80,00 won in total at his house located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment C apartment 25, 1511, and the total market value of 5,000 won.

The enforcement officer D belonging to the Seoul Northern District Court attached the above goods at the home of the above defendant on November 24, 2015 and attached a seizure mark on the goods with the consent of the creditor E to execute the execution. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23572, Nov. 24, 2015>

Nevertheless, around April 25, 2016, the Defendant moved the F apartment of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the above director without the approval of the execution officer.

Accordingly, the defendant, by concealing the above goods, has impaired the utility of the seizure marking conducted by the execution officer who is a public official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A report on seizure of tangible movables;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on inspection of seized objects;

1. Article 140 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;