If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

1. On July 20, 2010, the Defendant operated an unmarried female workers apartment house in Division-ri 122-1 and from around 122 to 01:50 on July 20, 2010, with no motor device bicycle driver’s license, from around 01:25, the Defendant driven approximately 10 km to 50c tex tex from around 10 km to the front street in the same military sector.

2. Around 01:50 on July 20, 2010, the Defendant used a brick (21 cm in length, 10 cm in width) which is a dangerous object on the road adjacent to the victim E in order to make up for the D operation of the victim E in the order of Chungcheong budget D, and cut off the glass by putting the hand into the display stand, thereby cutting off the victim’s market value of KRW 62,00,000, which was kept in custody in the display stand, and cut off it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. A receipt for an article damaged;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of special larceny), subparagraph 2 of Article 154 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of driving a motorcycle without obtaining a license or a fine) of the same Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of the following grounds for sentencing, etc.);

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant had already been punished by imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of larceny, etc. over three times, and the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she had the same history of being punished by a fine due to the same act of violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) once, taking into account the time and method of the crime, etc., the crime is not good, and the fact that there is no agreement with the victim is an element for sentencing unfavorable to the Defendant.