beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.10.22 2014가합201937

손해배상(의)

Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff A is the husband of the deceased C (hereinafter “the deceased”), and the Plaintiff B is the father of the deceased.

B. On April 29, 2013, the Deceased was hospitalized in the hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) on May 14, 2013, as a result of the plepic recording of a plepic chronic photo (MRI) on a chest 10-11-12 in the plepic chronic chrone.

On May 15, 2013, the deceased was diagnosed as vertebrate inverte vertebrate, and began to use anti- tuberculosis medication. On May 29, 2013, the deceased continued to use anti- tuberculosis and was discharged from the Defendant hospital.

C. On June 5, 2013, the Deceased, who was suffering from pains, such as those during the period, was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital again. On June 9, 2013, the scarletic scarletic scarcity which was implemented on June 9, 2013, the scarletic scarletic scarletic scarletic scarcity increased more than the relocation, and the pressure of the number of saves by saves was well observed.

After that, the Defendant Hospital, which was found in the state where it is difficult for the deceased to check the pains of the deceased, carried out the bruptism of the deceased on June 19, 2013, No. 8-9-10-12 and 12 of the chronology and the chronology of the deceased on June 19, 2013.

After the operation, the pressure of the number of self-made images taken after the operation showed the opinion that the pressure of the body was resolved through the suppression of pressure.

E. However, immediately after the operation, the deceased showed incomplete paralysis symptoms, and the deceased continuously complained of the pain.

The Defendant Hospital performed a surgery on the same day for confirmation, as it is not clear that the body pressured on the deceased’s number of shots was not clear even in the chest climatic image of the deceased.

F. After all, the Defendant hospital conducted rehabilitation treatment to the Deceased, considering the condition that the paralysiss continue to exist on both sides of the Deceased, and the Deceased complained of serious pains on the part of the resistance and the telegraph, and continued hospitalization for the Deceased by considering disorder on the side.

G. Until October 8, 2013, the Deceased.