2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant;

After opening a mobile telephone opening agency in the name of "F" in the name of "D and others (the name of the third party"), the Defendant purchased a forged identification card from circulation of forged identification cards, and arbitrarily stated the personal information of the third party in the application form for mobile telephone opening, etc., and submitted it to the mobile phone company, and sold a high-priced mobile phone terminal to the head of the Gu and divide the profits therefrom.

Accordingly, around August 24, 2012, the Defendant remitted the amount of KRW 5 million to D to be paid to 5,000,000 to G who provided false business name to F. Around that time, the Defendant paid KRW 1,20,000 to H’s wage, which is an employee of F, for the purpose of raising funds necessary for the establishment and operation of the above F, such as providing funds necessary for the purchase of forged identification cards (the total amount of KRW 3,00,000,000). D, using the funds provided by the Defendant, purchased forged identification cards from I, J, etc. sales, by using the funds provided by the Defendant, by purchasing a copy of his/her identification card, and submitted an application for subscription to the mobile phone in the name of the nominal owner, submitted an application for subscription to the mobile phone in the name of the victim and

1. Around August 27, 2012, under the foregoing public offering, D forged Private Document: (a) written “K”, “L”, “L”, “L” in the State column, and “K” in the customer column, using a forged resident registration certificate under the name of K purchased with the money provided by the Defendant from the above I from the seller of forged identification card; and (b) written “K” on the name column of the new service contract in the name column; and (c) written “K” in the name column of the State column; and (d) written at will a copy of the new service contract in the name of K, a private document on the rights and obligations of the applicant’s name.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with D, forged a new contract under the name of K for the purpose of exercising the contract.