A. Defendant 1) Although there was no indecent act by force against the victim on or around June 25, 2009, including the part found guilty in the lower court’s judgment, the lower court’s judgment convicting the victim of this part of the facts charged was erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment. 2) Even if the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim around June 25, 2009, such as the part found guilty at the lower court, the victim was found guilty on or around June 25, 2009, 30 women who completed the normal course of study, and the degree of religious experience and knowledge about the opening of the new school as 30 women who completed the normal course of study, and the victim was found to be the Defendant even though he was committed for a long time by force, and the lower court’s judgment was impossible or difficult to help the victim to commit an indecent act by force on the part of the Defendant’s wife, who was the wife of the second floor level of the second floor and its surrounding people.

3) According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor of mistake of facts, the court below's sentence (eight months of imprisonment) against the defendant on the grounds of unfair sentencing is too unreasonable and unfair. B) According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor of mistake of facts, the defendant from January 15, 2009 to January 16, 2009, such as the annexed list of crimes Nos. 1 through 4, 6

5. The part of this case can be recognized by the 15th time until March 31, on the ground that there is no proof of criminal facts.