폭행
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, on October 22, 2016, at around 03:25, 2016, 03:25, while drunk around E convenience stores in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D, without any reason, to the Victim F (18:3) of the Defendant “breathing in the snow.”
(1) be dead, or dead.
"In doing the bath theory, the victim spawddd the drinking and breathed the breath.
Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.
[The defendant reported to the police in the process of vision while in the state, but who is not aware of the site location, C and the victim explained the location of the site to send the police.
From the police stage to this court, C and the victim's statements are consistent and concrete.
Unlike, there is no room for false intervention in the statements of C and the victim.
According to these circumstances, the defendant assaulted the victim as stated in the facts of the crime.
person may be appointed.)
Summary of Evidence
1. Entry of a defendant in part in the third public trial records;
1. Each legal statement of the witness C and F;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal accidents;
1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;
1. Since the sentencing criteria have been selected as a fine on the facts constituting the crime in which the sentencing criteria are not applied, the sentencing criteria shall not apply.
2. The defendant who has been sentenced to criminal punishment several times for violent crimes, such as assault, etc., and the defendant currently is serving a repeated offense period, etc. shall take into account unfavorable circumstances.
The following shall be considered in light of the favorable circumstances: (a) the extent of damage is minor when the assault is committed against the victim; (b) the fact that it appears to be a contingent crime that has occurred with the victim; and (c) the fact that the defendant stated to the effect that it is against the part that has caused a water while disputing whether
The age, sex, environment, and motive and motive of the crime of the defendant.