However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 24, 2017, the Defendant reported to the police officer E belonging to the police station of the Dong-dong Police Station of the Jeju Police Station, who was called out after receiving 112 a report that “the Defendant lost a wall” and “the Defendant lost a wall” at C hotel located in B at the time of Jeju on June 24, 2017, without stating the reasons for the Defendant’s report.

C. In doing so, it was difficult to avoid disturbance, such as emitting safety fences for construction in the neighborhood.

Therefore, the above E was removed from the Defendant, and the Defendant took flab with flab, and obstructed a police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to the handling of the reported case and investigation of the 112 report case by making the face part of the above E one hand at one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Services Criminal Act are as follows: (a) considering the following circumstances; (b) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment; (c) circumstances after committing the crime; and (d) various conditions of sentencing as indicated in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the circumstances after the crime

A defendant who is recognized as committing a crime and against his/her nature is deemed to have lost his/her wall;

It is not clear that the crime was committed against the police officer by making a report without any particular reason, and there was no violation of the nature of the crime, and there was a violation of the Kameras, which is a public object, in the police box in 2011, damaged the Kameras and was punished by a fine for damage to the public object.