(a) portable toilets, septic tanks, located on the ground of 290 square meters in Gyeonggi-gun C, Gyeonggi-do;

A. On September 3, 1996, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the Defendant under the receipt of No. 21323 of September 7, 1996 on the Suwon District Court’s Yangyang District Court’s receipt of September 7, 1996 with respect to the land before the instant subdivision (hereinafter “the land before the instant subdivision”).

B. On April 28, 1997, the land prior to the instant partition was divided into the 858m2, F field 696m2, G field 486m2, H road 155m2, and the said D land was further subdivided into the 15m2 and 325m2 on January 22, 2007.

On January 18, 2013, the said C was divided into three-five square meters for C large 290 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and J large 35 square meters.

C. As to the instant land, from July 30, 2007 to E, the registration of ownership transfer was completed due to the sale in the future of K, and thereafter the registration of ownership transfer was completed on February 21, 2017 for the Plaintiff to the next day.

At present, on the instant land, various items, such as portable toilets, septic tanks, water tanks, trucks, light strings, strings, fences, fences, iron bars, gymnas, 1mags, and temporary gates owned by the Defendant are left unattended, and pine 5gs and 15ggs (hereinafter “the instant trees”) are planted.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's 1 to 4 evidence, Eul's 8 evidence (including branch numbers, if any) or video, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the removal of goods, the delivery of land, and the claim for monetary payment

A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of claim, since the defendant neglected goods owned by the defendant on the land of this case, thereby hindering the exercise of the plaintiff's ownership on the land of this case, the plaintiff is obligated to collect various goods neglected on the ground of this case and deliver the land of this case.

In addition, the defendant occupies and uses the land of this case by neglecting his own goods. Thus, the defendant raises objection to the plaintiff.