However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around December 18:10 on December 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was in the state of having weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to mental illness, such as damage, symptoms, etc.; (b) around 18:10, the Defendant: (c) around the D hotel street in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and (d) around the network where D hotel E president, etc. sing and drinking himself, etc. (e.g., 2 beer, and (e., 4:1) had a beer who was a victim F (ma, 42 years old) who is the above hotel manager, and a beer who was divided into a farcing ties with the above hotel employees, such as the above victim, etc., who kept a beer over the brod, and puts a beer in the farc with the above victim’s remaining beer who was a dangerous object, and farcing the farc with the end of the farc.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous things and inflicted injury upon the victim in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A CD (on-site CCTV video recordings);

1. Certificates of medical treatment;

1. Application of investigative reports, investigation reports, and criminal investigation reports, and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning a crime, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In full view of the following: (a) Articles 10(2) and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of mental illness (a) of the Act: (b) comprehensively considering the Defendant’s symptoms recognized by the foregoing evidence; (c) the motive and circumstance of the instant crime; (d) the circumstances after the instant case; and (e) the Defendant’s statutory attitude at the time of the instant crime; (b) it is recognized that the Defendant had weak the ability to discern things

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation;

1. The scope of applicable sentences: Imprisonment for nine to seven months;

2. Imprisonment with prison labor for the recommended sentence for the sentencing criteria, from June to June of one year.