However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

[Criminal facts against the defendants] Game related business entities should not allow the defendants to engage in gambling or other speculative acts or leave them to do so by using game products.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, while jointly operating D in the above game room C and the second floor, are registered as the operator of the above game room, Defendant A played the role of paying real estate rent and management fee, and Masan. Defendant B is in charge of the management of employees in the game room, paying wages to employees, and paying Madry Appraisal after the completion of the business, and it is anticipated that customers are not at will unless they are engaged in ordinary exchange transactions. Thus, even with the knowledge that there is so-called exchange transactions in cash transaction within the above game room, the Defendants conspired to use it to create profits from the game room.

From August 23, 2019 to February 12, 2020, the Defendants established 100 points per game after inserting 10,000 points one time from the above D from around August 23, 2019 to filling 10,000 points for each game, and operated the game site in such a way as to make the said game points commercialized by purchasing points at the request of customers selling the above points, and by transferring them to the customers with a certain percentage of 110 points according to the picture.

As a result, the Defendants got customers to perform speculative acts using game products and let them do so.

[Criminal facts against Defendant A] Game related business operators are gambling using game products.