대부업등의등록및금융이용자보호에관한법률위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a form of punishment) by the court below against the defendant (as to the crimes listed in Attached Table 2 Nos. 1 to 60, 62, 63, and 64 of the List of Crimes in the judgment of the court below: Imprisonment for six months, crimes No. 1 of the judgment of the court below, and other crimes listed in the judgment of the court below: imprisonment for one year, one year, three years of probation, three years of community service, 200 hours, and confiscation)
2. The Defendant had received a considerable amount of interest exceeding the statutory interest rate while running a credit business without registration or registration for about three years. Such crime is recognized as having the history of criminal punishment of fines on several occasions due to the Defendant’s act of running a credit business beyond the limited interest rate, in light of the legislative intent of the Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Finance Users, which aim at ensuring the sound development of credit business as well as protecting finance users and contributing to protecting the economic life of the nation.
However, it seems that the defendant led to the confession of the crime and living under detention for about six months, and that the defendant did not seem to have used an illegal method for the recovery of the loan; the defendant did not have any record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine for the same kind of crime; some of the crimes in this case are concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act with the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective weapon, deadly weapons, etc.) which became final and conclusive on December 25, 2010 and the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and it is recognized to take into account the age, character, character and equity of the defendant at the same time under Article