beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2014.05.28 2014고정83

사문서위조등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On March 8, 2011, the Defendant had the said attorney-at-law staff, who is unable to know his/her name without the consent of E, enter the name in the delegation column at the lower end of the delegation letter of the lawsuit to print the “EF” and the lower address column into the “Seoul Northern-gu G apartment 801”, and affixed the seal of E’s name prepared in advance to the right side of the name.

B. On May 31, 2012, the Defendant again prepared a letter of delegation of a lawsuit in the same manner to appoint an attorney-at-law at the second instance.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged a letter of delegation of lawsuit, which is a private document on rights and obligations in the name of E, for the purpose of exercising two times.

2. The Defendant exercised each of the following events by allowing the staff of the above attorney-at-law office who was unable to know his name at the Daegu-gu Daegu-gu District Court at around the time of each of the following events: (a) each of the above forged attorney-at-law’s delegation of each of the above facts was submitted as if they were duly constituted documents.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the head of a complaint, a letter of delegation of a lawsuit, a chief of the Daegu District Court, a chief of the Daegu District Court, a criminal investigation report (in relation to the location of a suspect), an investigation report (in relation to the location of his/her residence), an investigation report, a commission (in relation to the location of a suspect), a criminal investigation report, an investigation report (in relation to the defendant), a reply to the case (in

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment (the fact of aiding and abetting private documents, the choice of fines) and Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising private investigation documents and the selection of fines).