However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal history] The Defendant, at the Daegu District Court on July 10, 2007, issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating road traffic laws (drinking driving), and 3 million for a crime of violating road traffic laws (drinking driving) on December 13, 2007 at the Seog Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court on December 13, 2007, and driving under the influence of alcohol more than twice by receiving a summary order of KRW 3 million.

[Criminal facts] On November 11, 2017, the Defendant driven a B-learning car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.122% from the 1km section from the 1km to the west-ro (west change) in the front of the apartment parking lot located in the west-gu, Daegubuk-gu, Daegu-gu (west change) to the west-ro (west change) of the same Gu.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of written inquiries about criminal history and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (or choice of imprisonment);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include the frequency and time when the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, the concentration of alcohol in blood at the time of driving the drinking of this case, the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., as stated in the arguments of this case, shall be determined as ordered by considering the various factors for sentencing as stated in the argument of this case.