beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.06.16 2017가단1461

대여금

Text

1. The defendant's KRW 67,200,00 for the plaintiff and 25% per annum from December 26, 1991 to January 30, 2007.

Reasons

1. Claim by the Seoul Eastern District Court 2006da79392 against the Defendant indicating the Plaintiff’s claim for interruption of prescription for the claim as set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article based on a final and conclusive judgment

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);