However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the execution of the above fine.

No one shall commit any act of lending any means of access while promising to use and manage the means of access.

Nevertheless, around February 21, 2020, the Defendant offered a proposal that, prior to the Ulsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “C” restaurant, the Defendant would lend the check of access to the means of access if he/she borrowed the check from his/her name-free person to obtain the loan, he/she provided the Kwikset Service article with one check connected to the Agricultural Cooperative (D) account in the name of the Defendant and promised to provide the loan.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on financial transactions;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 6(3)2 and 6(3)2 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for confinement in a workhouse (in cases where a sentence of suspended execution of punishment is invalidated or revoked and the defendant fails to pay a fine);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Article 62