"2015 Highest 779" Defendant 1 operated on May 2013, 201 by himself/herself in Daegu Metropolitan City, Seo-gu D.

E There is no money that is operated to operate the store to the victim F at the E-place.

In addition, deposit amount is KRW 50 million, and KRW 20 million will be lent, and the name of the deposit will be changed in the future.

In addition, the expiration of the ten-month period, and the expiration of the ten-month period, it was false that it is possible to prepare money after the lapse of the ten-month period, and that it is possible to receive money after the lapse of one month because her husband and her husband are in a divorce lawsuit.

However, facts have been operated by the defendant at the time.

E The deposited amount of KRW 10 million was limited to KRW 10 million, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged party, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to secure the deposit, or to pay the borrowed money properly.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) obtained a total of KRW 9 million from the victim on May 12, 2013 as a loan borrowed money from the victim; and (c) acquired a total of KRW 18 million from the victim on June 12, 2013 under the same name.

"2015 Highest 856"

1. On March 23, 2012, the defrauded of the deposit, the Defendant: (a) called “the victim H by phone called on March 23, 2012; and (b) the apartment contract period of the apartment, which was 80 million won in total, has expired one year; (c) 40 million won in total, and (d) will be returned when the contract period expires.”

However, in fact, the apartment house that the defendant was living was leased in KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 750,000,000, and the small property at the time was in excess of the active property, and there was no fixed profit, so there was no intention or ability to return it even if it was paid by the injured party.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and deceivings the victim, on the 26th day of the same month from the victim, to the account under the husband I of the defendant.