However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 18, 2015, the Defendant, within the D convenience store located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, around 23:30 on September 18, 2015, told the victim E (33) who is an employee of this day, to be dissatisfied with the fact that he prevented the dispute over the F's "F" prior to this day, and expressed the victim's face at hand, "I am saw, I am spath, I am spathy, I am spathy", followed the victim from the floor, followed the victim's face and breast part, followed the victim's face and breast part, followed by approximately 3 weeks of treatment, and caused the victim's injury, such as the mouth on the back of the back of the 9 week .

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a photograph and bodily injury certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances).

3. The sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed only once, taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for observing protection and observation is against his depth; (b) the previous conviction of a fine is limited; and (c) the damage is relatively minor; and (d

However, it does not make any effort to recover damage, thereby imposing the protection observation and ordering the recovery of damage due to the special observance.