The defendant pays to the applicant the amount of KRW 1,450,00,000.

The contents of the Defendant’s deception are partially different from those of the facts charged to the extent that the facts charged and the basic facts are identical and there is no concern about substantial disadvantage in exercising the Defendant’

The Defendant is a 100% holder of shares of G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”), and is a person who is the secretary general of H (hereinafter “H”) as an incorporated foundation and the actual operator.

On March 2013, 2013, the Defendant, through I, J, etc., who was a first police officer, revealed the above status to E and K, and owned several parcels of land in the Hsan loan limit.

In some of them, G entered into a contract to purchase 2.3 billion won, and the market price of the land was lower than 30 billion won.

G has already been paid 230 million won as down payment, and it has been issued a final and conclusive judgment stating that the transfer of ownership is subject to the payment of KRW 2.7 billion, “If a person who will purchase the land at the level of KRW 15 billion has already invested in the atmosphere to acquire the right to operate the H by acquiring the right to operate the land, he/she may dispose of the land, thereby gaining profits.” The current liability of H is limited to KRW 600 million, and H is limited to KRW 2 billion in the remaining land purchase and sale, and is more owned and operated in other land.” However, the Defendant decided to invest the total amount of KRW 2.7 billion in the board of directors (E1.5 billion, KRW 1.2 billion, KRW 2000,000). However, from around 203, the Defendant did not have a legitimate resolution of the board of directors’ appointment and appointment of H by the board of directors, such as the minutes of the meeting or the minutes of the board of directors, and did not have a legitimate resolution of the board of directors’ appointment and appointment.