공무집행방해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a D-to-purd motor vehicle.
1. 도로교통법위반(음주측정거부) 피고인은 2013. 1. 26. 19:10경 서울 양천구 목동 405에 있는 오목교역 8번 출입구 앞 도로를 술을 마신 상태에서 위 승용차를 운전하다가 서울양천경찰서 소속 경사 E으로부터 피고인에게서 술 냄새가 나고 얼굴에 홍조를 띠는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 약 30분간에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구 받았음에도 음주측정기를 부는 시늉만 하고 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.
2. The Defendant expressed the victim’s slope E, which requires a drinking measurement at the Seoul Yangcheon Police Station’s office for the same reasons as the preceding paragraph at the same time as in the preceding paragraph, and took the victim’s face behind it one time as a drinking, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties regarding criminal investigation for about 40 minutes, such as spiting, spit, and taking a bath against the victim’s face, which is the victim’s side.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement of E and F;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs refusing to measure drinking;
1. Relevant statutory provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 2 and Article 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts, Article 136 (1) of each Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;
1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code provides that the Defendant’s mistake is against his/her will, and that is the other party to the obstruction of performance of official duties.