성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
The defendant 8,000,000 won against the applicant C, and 30,000.
Punishment of the crime
"2016 Highest 6240"
1. On January 6, 2016, the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 3 million at the Internet hosting site at the Defendant’s house located in Busan Shipping Daegu EM No. 2410 of the same month to pay KRW 4-5,00,00,000 to the above F and twice a month, in which it is difficult to know the trade name in Busan Shipping Daegu around January 6, 2016, and on the other hand, at the Defendant’s house located in Busan Shipping Daegu E No. 2410 of the same month.
2. Fraud;
A. The Defendant, at the time and place as set forth in the above Paragraph 1, made a false statement to the victim F that “if a sexual intercourse is made, the Defendant would give the victim F KRW 3 million in compensation for the sexual intercourse.”
However, at the time, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the compensation even if he did not have any particular income and sexual intercourse with the victim.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim and deceiving him as such, acquired the pecuniary benefits of KRW 3 million by failing to pay the amount of the two times as stated in the above Paragraph 1 with the victim.
B. On January 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) obtained money in custody of KRW 12 million; (b) the Defendant would pay KRW 300,000,000 per month to the Victim F (hereinafter “G”); (c) “A person who engages in funeral services in the marine transport team at the Naran 21 years of age”; (d) the Defendant would pay KRW 4-5 times sexual intercourse during the Naran month to a person who is engaged in funeral services in the marine transport team; (b) provided that the Defendant would have prepared a loan certificate of KRW 15,00,00 in order to believe that he/she would not leave the water if he/she will receive KRW 3,00,000,000,000 from the Republic of Korea and throw it away.” (c) The Defendant would return the money to April 8, 2016.
However, the defendant did not engage in funeral services at the time, and even if he did not have any other occupation or income and received money from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to return it up to the above period.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.