beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.07 2016고단4618

사기

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The total liability of the telephone financial fraud organization in the name of the victims is called as a prosecutor or investigator belonging to the Seoul Central District Prosecutor's Office or the victims as if they were phone calls to unspecified victims, and they made the victims a false statement that "it is necessary to prove that the victims who suffered damage by fraudulent use of the account are in the process of investigation, and that they are unrelated to this, it is necessary to prove the fact by deposit in the account." On the other hand, for those who need loans, such as F and G, as if they are employees of financial institutions, they should create a transaction record and raise credit rating in order to obtain a loan. On the other hand, they made a false statement that "if money is deposited in the account, they shall withdraw the money and transfer it to our employees, and then have the victims withdraw the amount of damage from the victims through "H", and have the defendants receive the name of the title holder such as F and G account or the victim's withdrawn from the account, and the Defendants agreed to use the telephone financial fraud in order to use the money in the above account."

1. On June 22, 2016, the non-name telephone financial fraud assistance employee called the victim I (hereinafter referred to as 41 years of age) at a closed place and runs as if the public prosecutor belonging to the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office was in charge of the crime, “The party's account was stolen and used for the crime was committed, and the victim was under investigation with the Financial Supervisory Service upon receipt of the written complaint by the victim. It shall transfer money to the account to prove the fact that it is irrelevant to the party's identity through deposit in the account.” On June 22, 2016, the victim shall transfer money to the account in which it is impossible to prove the fact that it is irrelevant to the party's identity through deposit in the account.” On June 22, 2016, the victim is 2.2.