beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.05.25 2017고단1002

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Any person who violates the Automobile Management Act shall, when he/she takes over a registered motor vehicle, apply for the registration of transfer of ownership to the Mayor/Do Governor as prescribed by Presidential Decree;

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not apply for the registration of the transfer of name within 15 days without justifiable grounds, even though he/she acquired the EM5 car owned by the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. from a member of Ansan-si around June 2016 from a member of the Sinsan-si, Suwon-si, a member of the Sinsan-si, to a third party

2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance shall be operated on a road;

A. On August 18, 2016, around 19:30, the Defendant operated an ES5 car not covered by mandatory insurance at approximately 3 km section from the front road of the member-gu, Ansan-si to the 735-ro 735-ro from the same loan street.

B. On August 28, 2016, around 16:18, the Defendant operated the said car without mandatory insurance from the entrance of the Megian Island in Ansan-si to the 646th road in the same Gu-nam-ro.

(c)

On September 24, 2016, around 21:55, the Defendant operated the said car without mandatory insurance from approximately 300 meters from the front side of the Ireland to the front road of the same Gu.

3. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle EM5 vehicle in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act.

On September 24, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 21:55, and moved to the direction of the Loan Community Center from the direction of the IglandCC in the direction of the Loan Community Center, depending on one lane between the three-lane in front of the member G in Ansan-si, Ansan-si.

At the time of night, there was a duty of care to thoroughly operate the steering system and to safely proceed with the steering system by accurately operating the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so.