beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.02.20 2018고정694

특수협박등

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 14:40 on September 16, 2017, the Defendant threatened the Defendant with the Defendant’s house located in Mapo-gu Seoul apartment, Mapo-gu, by means of intimidation, that the Defendant brought the knife (the total length: 20cm, the knife length: 10cm), which is a dangerous object in the kitchen, and knife in the kitchen, and knife the knife onto the victim who was seated in the benife at the benife, and that the Defendant’s knife would not be knife if the Defendant died of the knife and the knife would be knife).

2. While the Defendant continued to dispute with the victim at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s bucks by walking bucks twice due to the bucks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Investigation report (to hear victim C telephone statements);

1. Regarding on-site photographs, kitchen photographs and special intimidation, the following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence are acknowledged: (i) the defendant brought a knife, which is a dangerous object, and brought about by the victim the knife toward the victim, and, in itself, it is recognized that the defendant intended to cause harm and injury to the other party to feel a fear by informing the other party of the harm and injury; (ii) the defendant attempted to say that the victim “if the victim died of a knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, the knife, and the victim was knife onto the face of the victim; and (iii) the defendant's behavior is recognized as a threat of harm and injury to

In addition, in relation to the point of violence, the following circumstances recognized by the above evidence, i.e., ① the defendant reported the victim to the victim and sent him to the victim, and even if the victim attempted to get his/her father out of the room as alleged by the defendant, it cannot be said that the defendant violated the above evidence unfairly.