However, each of the above cases against the defendants for two years from the date of the final conclusion of the judgment.

With respect to the case where approximately 2.5 tons of construction waste, such as waste concrete, generated at the time of the removal of a d art gallery inside and at least 2.5 tons in Jeju-si in the construction site, around January 2015, were buried at the above construction site, the facts were merely the case where the construction business operator performed at the above construction site and the F and G buried wastes were buried without permission, and there was no fact that the Defendants were not aware of the said temporary F and G’s intent to reclaim waste without permission.

1. On November 5, 2015, Defendant A appeared as a witness in Jeju District Court No. 302, Jeju District Court No. 302, which was located in Jeju Island No. 15:30 on November 5, 2015, and tried as a witness in a case of violation of the Waste Management Act with respect to No. 488 E of the said Court.