통행금지 등
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except when the judgment is used or added as follows.
The "approval for the establishment of a factory" in Part 9 of the fifth judgment of the first instance shall be applied to the "approval for factory establishment".
B. No. 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “The entry and video of the evidence No. 8-14” in the 17th instance judgment consisting of “The entry and video of the evidence No. 8 through No. 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 24, 25, 26, 28 (including the spot numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply)”.
C. Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as the "provision") shall be applied to "providing". D.
The 7th page of the judgment of the first instance is added to “A neighboring residents” (which appears to have people passing the instant land for the purpose of cultivating crops, etc. due to dry field in the vicinity of the land owned by the defendant).
E. Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance 13 to 15 is added as follows.
•The construction of drainage conduits, such as water supply pipes, to the land in this case by using the budget of the 2011 and around 2017 and the Gyeonggi-do, for the purpose of re-convenition of the above ground.”
F. The following is added between the 7th and 21th of the first instance judgment.
In addition, considering the purport of Gap evidence No. 11 and the whole argument, the plaintiff corporation B, D, E, J, L, etc. (hereinafter "Plaintiff B, etc.") among the owners of each land listed in the separate sheet No. 2, 3, and 6.
A) Around 2007, the Plaintiff prepared a written consent to the use of the road with AI and Plaintiff A, and the AI transferred KRW 60,000,000 to the deposit account (the deposit account used by the AD council) in the name of AJ on September 28, 2007. Around 2007.