대여금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 100,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from June 28, 2016 to December 8, 2016, and the following.
Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as indicated in the evidence Nos. 1 through 7, C leases KRW 100,00,000 to D around April 2013, and KRW 30,000,000 around August 29, 2014; ② the Defendant prepared a loan certificate to the effect that “A shall be liable for and repaid KRW 130,000,000 borrowed from D” on August 29, 2014; ③ A transferred the above loan claim to the Plaintiff on or around September 11, 2016, and the notification of transfer was given at that time.
Therefore, as a guarantor for the above loan obligations of D, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff unpaid loans and delay damages as described in paragraph (1) of this Article.
Although the defendant asserts to the effect that "C forced the defendant to guarantee the obligation," the defendant's above assertion is without merit, since there is no evidence to acknowledge it.
If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.