When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. At around 04:20 on October 16, 2013, the Defendant assaulted F when considering the face of the victim F, who was verbally at the end, on the ground that D and E came to become the first floor of the toilet of the building C in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, and that D and E came to become the first floor of the building C.

2. From around 16:50 on September 23, 2014 to around 17:15 on the same day, the Defendant 201 of the 2014 Highly 2095 interfered with the hospital duties by force for about 20 minutes, on the following grounds: (a) under the influence of alcohol in an emergency room located in the H hospital located in Seongdong-gu G, Sungnam-gu; (b) “Chewing feassing feass, grhing, and sprinking,” and (c) the above hospital officer and staff I (52 years of age) and the nursing staff who had been on duty in the emergency room.

Summary of Evidence

"2014 Highly 942"

1. Each legal statement of the witness F, J and K;

1. On-site photographs "2014, 2095";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of CCTV image Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act that applies to the relevant criminal facts and that of the choice of punishment: Selection of each fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. On October 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 04:20 on October 16, 2013, the summary of the facts charged showed the attitude that D and E would be at the front corridor of the toilet of the first floor of the building C in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, would be at the time of punishing the Defendant; and (b) threatened the victim with dangerous articles by carrying them.

2. There are statements in the F, E, J and K court and investigative agencies as direct evidence corresponding to the facts charged in this part of the judgment.

(D) The statements made in the investigation agency of F, E, J, and K are inadmissible as evidence. First of all, the health care unit and the first priority of F are the accused's soldiers.