특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On May 1, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving a motor vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license from the front side of the 21st intersection forest apartment road located in the Gangseo-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-
2. On January 28, 2008, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving without a license), issued a summary order of KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00
Although the Defendant had been punished twice due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) as above, on May 2, 2017, the Defendant 1 driven a B-hurd vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.249% without obtaining a driver’s license from the 1km section of approximately 1km to the erode erode of the eroscopic road located in Gangseo-si, Gangwon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City from the 3:35 on May 2, 2017 to the eroscopic intersection in 2996.
3. The Defendant is a person who drives a motor vehicle with soflurd B, in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from dangerous driving).
On May 2, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 03:35, and led to a two-lane road in front of the valley middle school located in Gangseo-si, Gangseo-si, along the south-dong side from the middle school located in the middle school at a rate of 0:0 to the south-dong side.
At the time, there are nights and there are frequent intersections in front of the vehicle, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to thoroughly drive the vehicle in front and in accordance with good faith.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected the above duty of care and neglected the above duty of care, but it was caused by the negligence of entering the intersection in violation of this, thereby leading up to the right side of the defendant's proceeding.