2. The judgment of the defendant is recognized that his mistake is divided, and that the defendant is the first offender who has no criminal history.

However, considering the fact that the nature of the crime of this case is not good, the damage recovery or agreement is not reached due to the crime of this case until the trial of the party, the balance of sentencing with the crime of this case, the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and other various conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act and it is so decided as per Disposition (Provided, That since it is clear that the "E" of the second 2 Myeon 12 of the judgment below is a clerical error of "F", the judgment of the court below is modified under Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure and it is corrected as it is modified).