beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.11.20 2012고단3197

배임수재

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 1 and 6 months for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On August 30, 2011, the Jeonju District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution to six months of imprisonment for fraud, which became final and conclusive on October 25, 201.

[207] At the time of February 2006, the Defendant did not have any particular property as a bad credit holder, and the situation where the Defendant was difficult to operate the construction business chain Co., Ltd., which was operated by the Defendant, was under circumstances leading to the shortage of operating funds. It would have been urgent from 2003 to 6 million won, and it would be extremely difficult for the Defendant to financially and economically, such as being sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million on February 6, 2006 due to the crime of operating a vehicle which was not covered by liability insurance from 2003 to 2004. Therefore, even if the Defendant received a discount or borrowed money from the victim F (hereinafter referred to as 46 years of age), there was no intention or ability to repay it.

1. Nevertheless, on February 2006, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would have to pay back the bill with an endorsement in the name of the company run within the country and to pay the bill without a mold,” at the office of Minejin Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd., the victim F at the time when the victim F was active at the time of the full-time and full-time efficienction of the bill.”

However, it is difficult for the Defendant to do so, and even if the bill is discounted by the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent and ability to settle the bill in accordance with the responsibility of endorsement. In addition, the above bill is not a scarbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb

Around February 8, 2006, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above, and, on the pretext of a bill discount from the victim, by deceiving the victim in the same manner in the same place from May 29, 2006 to receive 3.6 million won from the post office account under the name of the Defendant, and by deceiving the victim in the same manner from May 29, 2006, including by deceiving the victim from the victim in total seven times, such as the statement in the list of crimes in the annexed sheet of crimes.