beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.12.11 2019나44776

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant).

Reasons

(a)be adjacent to each other;

In addition, the main room of the defendant store is located on the side of the wall abutting on the plaintiff's store.

(2) In order to find out the causes of water leakage in the Plaintiff store, the Plaintiff left the Plaintiff store with a water leakage detection. On July 14, 2017, R visited the Plaintiff’s store and the Defendant store, along with the Defendant’s manager of the instant shopping district, with a temporary closure of the sewage hole in the Defendant shop, and a water leakage detection method was conducted by examining whether the Defendant store temporarily shuts down the sewage hole in the main room and water to the degree of door-to-door height, and then written a written confirmation of water leakage detection results as follows.

Detection Contents

2. 1) On-site air conditioners and water detection: At normal 2) Waterproof inferiors for the main floor: Water leakage is discovered.

4. Mho-O air-containers: The results of detection that leakage is discovered at sight;

1. The partitions of F (Plaintiff’s store) was discovered from the wall due to the poor main floor waterproof construction works of I (Defendant shop). 2. M (O) The leakage can be discovered from the wall. * The failure of the Defendant shop’s main waterproof construction works and the leakage can be found to be carried out as the inundation of the O (M) container. (3) The Defendant, upon the Plaintiff’s request, requested the U.S. to a separate water leakage detection of water supply equipment, pipes repair business, etc. using the trade name “T”.

U drafted a certificate of water leakage construction in July 18, 2017, in which water leakage detection was conducted, and the content is as follows:

As a result of the examination of the pressure of pipelines in the Defendant shop, it is expected that the sewage pipe is not capable of water leakage in the Defendant shop as a result of re-inspection after repairing the tap water, hot water pipes, and sewage pipes because it is impossible to make accurate hydrostatic pressure tests after leaving the water tank back, as the result of the re-inspection after repairing the water tank, it is anticipated that the sewage pipe is not found as a result of the sprinking of the sprink. The sewage pipe will not be found. The Defendant shop continues at the weekend.