beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.07.11 2018고단1858

사문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. A. On March 24, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime: (a) around March 24, 2015, at the Mayang-gu C Certified Judicial Scriveners Office located in Ansan-gu, B around March 24, 2015; (b) in order to set up a collateral on the E-land and its ground in the light-to-land and the building owned by Defendant D, the Defendant was aware of the fact as if he was delegated with the authority to make a proxy; (c) even though he was not delegated with the authority to make a proxy; (d) as if he was delegated with the authority to delegate the authority to make an application for registration to C certified judicial scrivener; and (d) was stated as D in the proxy form,

D’s seal affixed, a power of attorney was prepared, and as such, a forged power of attorney was sent to the staff of the certified judicial scrivener office who is not aware of the forgery.

For the purpose of exercising, the Defendant, without authority, forged a letter of delegation in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations, and exercised it.

B. On April 16, 2015, the Defendant entered “D” and “F” into the customer name column of the loan transaction agreement and sent one copy of the forged loan transaction agreement to an employee under the name of the Defendant who was not aware of the forgery by facsimile, even though the Defendant did not have obtained consent from D with respect to the receipt of a loan under the name of the Defendant D. However, with a view to obtaining a loan from the Plaintiff’s social loan (State). On the Internet homepage of the loan transaction agreement, the Defendant entered “D” and “F” into the customer name column of the loan transaction agreement, and sent one copy of the forged loan transaction agreement to an employee under the name of the Defendant who was unaware of the forgery by facsimile.

For the purpose of exercising, the Defendant, without authority, forged a copy of a loan transaction agreement in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations, and exercised it.

(c)

On May 7, 2015, the Defendant committed a crime, G a certified judicial scrivener who is located around May 7, 2015.