건물명도
1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the real estate stated in the attached list.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
3...
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On December 3, 2003, the Defendant entered into a contract on the lease of real estate (hereinafter “instant apartment”) listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant apartment”) which is constructed rental housing from the Gwangju Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Seoul Construction”), and continued to renew the said lease agreement, and agreed on the termination of the said lease agreement as follows.
Article 10 (Cancellation and Termination of Lease Contracts) (1) If the defendant commits an act falling under any of the following subparagraphs, he/she may cancel or terminate this contract, or refuse to renew the lease contract:
2. Article 13 of the former Rental Housing Act (wholly amended by Act No. 8966, Mar. 21, 2008) which was in force at the time of the instant lease agreement under Article 13 of the Rental Housing Act provides, “A lessee of a rental house shall neither transfer (including sale, donation, and all other acts accompanying the alteration of a right, but excluding inheritance) the right of lease nor sublease the rental house to any other person: Provided, That this shall not apply to cases prescribed by Presidential Decree, where an agreement of the rental business operator has been obtained.”
In case where he transfers the right of lease of a rental house to another person or subleases the rental house in contravention of the provisions.
B. On August 4, 2016, the Plaintiff purchased the instant apartment from Gwangju Construction, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on August 26, 201.
C. The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit against the Defendant claiming that the Defendant terminated the instant lease agreement, claiming that the Defendant sub-leaseed the instant apartment to a third party, and the instant warden, which contained the Plaintiff’s intent of termination, was served on December 9, 2016 on the Defendant.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The cause of the action.