손해배상(자)
1. The Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff A, KRW 9,462,689; (b) against Plaintiff B, C, D, E, F, and G, respectively, KRW 5,308,459; and (c) against each said money. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 27572, Jun. 1,
1. Facts of recognition;
A. At around 18:15 on October 19, 2016, I driven a J bargaining car (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) and shocked the front portion of the LOba (hereinafter “the network”) driven by K driving on the front side of the left side of the Defendant vehicle, driving on the front side of the entrance of the CObaeeee-gu in the Yan-ri-Eup in the Yancheon-si, in order to ensure the right-hand side of the Defendant vehicle, at the right-hand side of the COba (hereinafter “the network”).
(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.
Due to the instant accident, K died on November 7, 2016, when receiving hospitalized treatment due to the injury, such as liver, warden, and cerebral blood, etc.
(hereinafter referred to as “K”). (c) K
Plaintiff
A The wife, Plaintiff B, C, D, E, F, and G are children of the deceased.
The defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract against the defendant vehicle.
【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1, 3, 5, and 6 (including all family cards with a serial number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The summary of the allegations by the parties is the road bended by Sho, and most vehicles that run in the direction of the vehicle of the defendant is the place where the central line is faced with without speed. The engine box installed on the right side of the deceased's Otobae is located, and the engine box installed on the side of the right side of the deceased's Otoba, which is identical to the center line, appears to be fast to the way of the defendant's vehicle over the center line after the collision. In light of the fact that the final stop of the defendant's vehicle toward the right side of the lane after the collision of the vehicle of the deceased's Otoba, it appears that the accident of this case occurred from the road of the deceased's Obae, and it appears that the vehicle of this case was returned rapidly to his own main line after the collision of the above Obabae on the road of the vehicle of this case. It is due to the negligence of the defendant's central course.