However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 26, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 from the Ulsan District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 1.5 million from the same court on February 23, 2009 to a fine for the same crime, respectively.

On October 18, 2019, at around 22:05, the Defendant driven a Dogland under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.069% from approximately 100 meters to the front road of the C front of Yangsan City.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Provisions of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing criminal records and summary orders pertaining to the defendant's legal statement, the report on his/her circumstantial statement made by the driver under influence of alcohol;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The punishment against the defendant shall be determined by taking into consideration the circumstances leading to the running of drinking alcohol for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the blood alcohol concentration, driving distance, criminal punishment records, the circumstances after the crime, etc.;